Brooklyn, NY Personal
Injury Lawyers

(718) 395-6126

142 Joralemon Street, Suite 500
Brooklyn, NY 11201

  • Home
  • Credentials Matter
  • Practice Areas
    • Brooklyn Personal Injury Lawyers
    • Car Accident Lawyers in Brooklyn
    • Brooklyn Workers Compensation Lawyers
    • Medical Malpractice Lawyers of Brooklyn Persoonal Injury Law
    • Wrongful Death Lawyers in Brooklyn NY
    • Mesothelioma
  • Blog
  • Free Case Evaluation

February 12, 2021 by admin

Sasha Baron Cohen’s Borat movies are popular with fans of Cohen’s cringe-worthy satire

Sasha Baron Cohen’s Borat movies are popular with fans of Cohen’s cringe-worthy satire.  They have also been popular targets for lawsuits.  Baron Cohen and the producers of the two Borat films, Borat:  Cultural Learnings of America for Make Benefit Glorious Nation of Kazakhstan and Borat Subsequent Movie Film, have been sued at least seven times.  In the movies, Baron Cohen plays Borat, a clueless and crude journalist from Kazakhstan.  Baron Cohen lures unsuspecting subjects into embarrassing situations, as his Borat character pretends to be on a quest to learn about American culture.  Several people, unhappy with their unflattering portrayals in the movies, have filed suit, claiming to have been tricked into unwittingly participating in the movies.

To date, the lawsuits have achieved only limited success.  While Baron Cohen clearly does not warn his subjects that his intent is to embarrass them in a film that will be widely viewed in the United States, Baron Cohen does have his subjects sign a release before filming.  Presumably, Baron Cohen allows his participants to have the impression that he is filming a documentary that will be shown in Kazakhstan, while the release allows Baron Cohen and his studios broad rights to use the footage.

Following the release of the first film in 2006, Baron Cohen and 20th Century Fox were sued by an Alabama etiquette coach, Kathie Martin, who accused Baron Cohen of “tricking her into being a part of a childish prank.”  Martin, perhaps one of the more sympathetic plaintiffs in the lawsuits filed against Baron Cohen, engaged in a futile attempt to teach Borat Southern manners, only to bring Borat to a dinner party where he defecated into a plastic bag .  Citing the language in the release signed by Martin, the Alabama Supreme Court dismissed the lawsuit, although one of the justices expressed sympathy for the fact that Martin had been exposed to “boorish and offensive” behavior.

Baron Cohen and 20th Century Fox were also sued following the first film by two University of South Carolina fraternity brothers after the movie showed the fraternity brothers making sexist and racist comments.  Like Martin, the fraternity brothers claimed that they had been tricked into participating in the movie, contending they had been told that the film would not be shown in the United States. They also claimed that Baron Cohen took advantage of their intoxication.  Again, this suit was dismissed based on the release language. 

Some scenes in the first Borat movie were filmed in the village of Glod, Romania.  For their appearance as extras in the film, villagers received $70 to $100 each, although some people received as little as three lei (the equivalent of $1.28 at the time).  After learning of the success of the movie, villagers filed suit, seeking $83 million in damages.  The lawsuit was dismissed in 2006 and again in 2008.

One lawsuit that achieved some success was filed by a Macedonian singer, Esma RedZepova, who alleged that one of her songs had been used in the movie without her permission.  She sued for $800,000  but was awarded approximately $26,000.

The most poignant story about litigation arising out of the Borat movies involves a lawsuit filed by the daughter of a Holocaust survivor over her mother’s appearance in the 2020 sequel.  In the movie, Borat interviews Holocaust survivor, Judith Dim Evans, and espouses anti-Semitic and Holocaust-denying views.  Rather than reacting with justifiable anger, Evans tries to explain, with patience and kindness, why Borat’s views are wrong.  It is one of the few instances in the Borat films where a participant in the film is portrayed favorably.  Unfortunately, Evans passed away before the movie was released.  Concerned that her mother was made to be the butt of one of Baron Cohen’s jokes, Evans’ daughter filed suit prior to the release of the film, contending that Baron Cohen and Amazon had misappropriated her mother’s likeness.  In the suit, Evans’ daughter sought an injunction, requiring Amazon to remove Evans from the film.  Ultimately, Baron Cohen, who has made combating Holocaust denial a personal cause, dedicated the movie to Evans.  Baron Cohen also helped create a website in Evans’ honor and Amazon is developing bonus content for the film that will tell Evans’ Holocaust story.  The lawsuit was dismissed.

If you believe you have a strong case for injury, find out more about your options by, contacting a personal injury lawyer in Sebastian, FL, like from Tuttle Law, as soon as possible.

Filed Under: Uncategorized Tagged With: personal injury lawyer

January 25, 2021 by admin

Can My Employer Fire Me for Filing a Workers’ Compensation Claim?

The short answer to the title question is no. By law, your employer cannot fire you for filing a workers’ compensation claim. In fact, your employer cannot retaliate against you in any way for filing such a claim.

Covered Retaliatory Actions

Each state has its own work comp laws, rules and regulations. It also has its own laws regarding what constitutes employer retaliation. In general, however, your employer is prohibited from doing any of the following when you file a work comp claim:

  • Firing you
  • Discriminating against you
  • Harassing you
  • Punishing you
  • Demoting you
  • Cutting your pay
  • Changing your job responsibilities
  • Subjecting you to unwarranted disciplinary action

Keep in mind that one of your main employee rights is that of filing a workers’ compensation claim whenever you sustain an on-the-job injury or contract a work-related illness. In fact, in most states, this is your exclusive remedy for obtaining compensation for these types of injuries and illnesses. Consequently, your employer cannot interfere with this right.

Suing Your Employer

If you believe you have been the victim of retaliatory action after filing a work comp claim, you may have a valid discrimination case against your employer. Your wisest strategy is to consult with an experienced local workers’ compensation lawyer or employment discrimination lawyer. He or she can listen to your story, assess what happened when and advise you of whether you have an actionable complaint.

If you do, you will not necessarily need to prove at trial that your work comp claim was the sole reason why your employer retaliated against you. You will, however, likely need to prove that your employer’s actions against you were unfair, unjustified and not based on any legitimate business reason. One way to prove this is by presenting evidence showing that you were the only employee against whom your employer took the prohibited action(s).

Your employer, of course, has the right to dispute your allegations and present evidence of his or her own.

Possible Damages

If you win your lawsuit, you likely will recover any pay or benefits you lost because of your employer’s retaliatory action(s). Depending on the laws of your state, plus the facts of your case, you may also recover the following:

  • Pain and suffering damages
  • Punitive damages
  • Your attorney’s fees
  • Your litigation costs

Unfortunately, employer retaliation cases are quite complicated and usually take a long time to conclude. Your attorney can act not only as your guide throughout the process, but also as your champion. If you have questions about a workers compensation case contact a workers compensation attorney, like the offices of Hurwitz, Whitcher & Molloy, Attorneys at Law for a consultation.

Filed Under: Uncategorized Tagged With: workers compensation lawyer

January 22, 2021 by admin

What if No One Is at Fault for Your Personal Injury?

Personal Injury Lawyer

In most accidents that result in injuries, someone is found at fault. If someone else was responsible for causing your injuries, it can make the claims process a little more straightforward, as you’ll turn to their insurance for compensation. However, what if no one is at fault for your injury? Who do you turn to for compensation then? The answers are usually simple, mainly because you can generally find fault, even if it is just your own. Here’s how fault is determined and what it means for your case.

Negligence and Fault

Fault for any injury is determined by the negligent actions of one or more of the parties involved in the accident. For example, if a driver was texting and they rear-ended another car, causing whiplash in that driver, the texting driver’s negligence would make them at fault. To file a claim with that person’s insurance, you must be able to prove that they were negligent and that their negligence caused the accident that led to your injuries.

Proving Negligence

Proving another’s negligence is a tricky task. To do so, you must provide evidence that confirms the other person’s negligence. For the texting driver, you may be able to speak to witnesses who can confirm the driver was texting just before the crash. The more evidence you give, the greater chance your claim has of success. If there is any doubt about who was at fault, the insurance company may refuse to compensate you.

No-Fault States

Most states have different laws for determining fault. Some split the fault between the two parties if both were partially at fault, while others are no-fault states. If you live in a no-fault state, you can only file a claim with your own insurance, even if another person caused your injuries.

When No One Is at Fault

If it seems like no one was at fault for your injury, take another close look at the situation. Slips and falls may appear innocent, but they can actually be the result of a company not properly maintaining the building or warning passersby of hazards. You may discover that your employer, another driver, or a company can be filed against for compensation.

If you are unclear about who is at fault for your injury, reach out to a personal injury lawyer, like from Barry P. Goldberg. They can help settle the facts about your case and create a strong claim to get you back on your feet.

Filed Under: Uncategorized Tagged With: personal injury lawyer

January 19, 2021 by admin

Withdrawing a Guilty Plea

Let’s say you are battling an endeavored burglary allegation. To keep away from a preliminary and confronting the greatest sentence for said violations, you take a request bargain. A liable supplication. There are a few reasons a blameless gathering may present a blameworthy request. Regardless of whether you are liable for wrongdoing, in some cases, confessing isn’t the most ideal approach. For your potential benefit, judges will permit a blameworthy supplication to be removed. This relies intensely upon current realities of the case and a few different conditions.

A Request to Withdraw
Requests are not always promptly acknowledged by an adjudicator, and in this example, a denier can pull out their supplication. This is also the situation if a request is removed before any condemning is finished. The equivalent would go for the indictment, so regardless of whether you present a supplication, it may not be unchangeable on one or the flip side. As you may expect, if a litigant chooses to acknowledge a request bargain, there are specifications that might be incorporated. For example, the option to claim that decision being surrendered. If you do as such, this doesn’t concern you the equivalent. While certainly feasible, the odds of having the option to have the supplication postponed will be extremely confounded.

Tossing Out Information
There are occurrences where an allure is extremely simple to come to. Say in your endeavored theft allegation, some proof was acquired wrongfully and contradicting counsel attempts to utilize this data against you, nearly constraining you into a request. On the off chance that it went to an allure and this data was found proof, it might be tossed out.

Obviously if it comes down to preliminary and you are seen not liable, your supplication will be tossed out. Different circumstances where withdrawals are basic are:

  • Plea entered without a respondent’s assent
  • New proof demonstrating guiltlessness
  • Constitutional rights abused
  • Not being completely educated regarding specifications of supplication
  • Accepted supplication through pay off, among a couple of others.

It isn’t insightful to acknowledge a request without legitimate lawful portrayal to help you in agreement what you are marking into. If you or someone you know has acknowledged a request bargain and have concluded that you need to have it removed, speak with a lawyer, like a criminal lawyer from The Lynch Law Group, who can survey the subtleties of your case and deliver your protection to an adjudicator or claims court so you may get an opportunity at a cleaner record.

Filed Under: Uncategorized

January 19, 2021 by admin

What You Should Know About a Divorce

Rarely does a person think about a divorce until they are forced to do so. At this point, a number of questions may arise. A divorce lawyer, like from Robinson & Hadeed, understands the complications and nuances of a divorce proceeding. If you or your spouse has filed for a divorce, you might be wondering what to expect with regards to a divorce judgement, assets, and other matters. Please review some of the most common questions about getting a divorce:

What is Spousal Support?

Spousal support is also known as alimony. This is a legal obligation to provide financial support to a spouse. This could happen before or after a divorce. Who will pay alimony largely depends on the factors of the situation. A divorce lawyer can explain this to you in further detail. 

How Will Assets Be Divided in a Divorce?

How assets and property is divided in a divorce is controversial and depends on the laws of the state. Most states have equitable distribution which means the assets are to be distributed equally. It does not necessarily mean 50/50, and rather will take into account a number of factors according to the laws and the case. 

How Are Retirement Accounts Handled?

Retirement benefits tend to be some of the largest assets involved in a divorce. Because of this, pensions, annuity’s, retirement accounts, and other benefits are often a large part of the divorce proceeding. The division of all retirement assets can be very complex and varies depending on the circumstances involved. 

When Will the Divorce Judgement Be Granted?

A judgement is granted when the court finds there are grounds for the divorce. In other words, there has been a breakdown of the marriage to the extent that all objects related to matrimony have been destroyed, and there is no likelihood the marriage will be able to resolve and preserve itself. 

A judgement can be entered when the defendant does not respond to the plaintiff’s complaint for the divorce, or the parties reach a settlement before or after trial. Judgements are put on record for a period of time. There will likely be a waiting period that can vary depending on whether or not children are involved. 

What Does a Divorce Judgement Include?

Divorce judgements can include a number of provisions, including insurance, annuities, retirement benefits, pensions, asset and property division, alimony, child support, child custody,  health care (when children are involved), moving children out of state, and more. It might also include provisions for legal fees, taxes, debt, name change of a party, injunctions, and so forth. 

Can A Divorce Judgement Be Challenged?

A party has the right to request relief from the judgement by asking for a new hearing or trial, or an amendment or clarification of the judgement. In general, you will have one year to file a motion to challenge the judgement. In the event something arises, such as a loss of a job, or a work-related move, you may need to ask a divorce lawyer to assist you for a modification (this is different from a challenge). 

What is An Alternative Dispute Resolution?

Also known as ADR, this has become more popular for divorcees who wish to keep costs low and stay out of the courtroom. The purpose of alternative dispute resolution is to give both parties more privacy, speed up the process, and prevent damages that could result from traditional proceedings. 

If you would like to know more about alternative dispute resolution, or the divorce process, please call a law firm to speak directly with a divorce lawyer. 

Filed Under: Uncategorized Tagged With: child custody lawyer

January 19, 2021 by admin

Class Action Lawsuit Filed Against Stock Trading App Robinhood

On January 11, GameStop stock (GME) soared after the company hired several new board members that investors believed would help the company boost its digital sales. A group on the website reddit.com called “WallStreetBets” began promoting the stock and the stock’s value rose over 1000% over the next couple of weeks. Due to the rise in the stock’s value, short-sellers who were betting against the stock had to buy shares to hedge their positions and send the stock even higher.

On January 28, 2021, a class action lawsuit was filed in the Southern District of New York on behalf of Brandon Nelson against Robinhood Financial LLC, Robinhood Securities LLC, and Robinhood Markets LLC alleging that the online brokerage firm purposefully, willfully, and knowingly removed the stock “GME” from its trading platform in the midst of an unprecedented stock rise thereby depriving retail investors of the ability to invest in the open-market and manipulating the open-market.

The lawsuit states that “On or about March 23, 2016, Robinhood’s official Twitter account stated: “Let the people trade.” They have since disregarded their mantra and have blocked access for millions of its customers to trade particular securities”.

The lawsuit alleges that on January 28, the Plaintiff used his Robinhood app and searched for the GameStop (GME) stock and found that it was not available and would not even appear in the app even though GameStop is a publicly traded company and available on all other platforms. Due to the unavailability of the app, the Plaintiff and many others lost out on all earning opportunities. Following Robinhood’s decision to restrict the purchasing of GME (GameStop) on January 28, the stock’s price dropped.

Furthermore, the lawsuit alleges “Upon information and belief, Robinhood is pulling securities like GME from its platform in order to slow growth and help benefit individuals and institutions who are not Robinhood customers but are Robinhood large institutional investors or potential investors”.

The class in the lawsuit was defined as All Robinhood customers within the United States and the subclass is defined as all Robinhood customers within the United States who were not able to execute trades on GME after Robinhood knowingly, willfully and purposefully removed it from their platform.

Robinhood entities and their current employees, counsel for either party, the court and its personnel presiding over this action are excluded from the class.

The lawsuit names four causes of action:

1. Breach of contract

2. Breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing

3. Negligence

4. Breach of fiduciary duty

The lawsuit seeks general damages, attorney fees and costs, punitive damages and any other relief the court deems just and fit as a catastrophic injury lawyer, like from Eglet Adams, can explain.

Filed Under: Uncategorized

January 18, 2021 by admin

“User Support Guide” for Spousal and Child Support

If you need to file for child support or spousal support, you may be wondering how in the world you go about getting the process started. Certainly, the last thing you want to do is go to your spouse to talk to them about it, and in this case, you don’t have to. But there is information that will help you navigate through this. 

Inter-State Variations

The amount and type of support that spouses and children receive varies across the US. The application procedures also differ. The best guide is your divorce attorney. You can fill out the paperwork online, but forms may not be user-friendly. There are many different factors to work out when you’re getting divorced, and child support and spousal support is an important one. Your lawyer will know the rules for your state and the information that you will need to fill out. In short, they can make sure that you receive the support you deserve.

Necessary Information to Provide

State’s policies differ; however, there is typical information to provide to calculate spousal and child support. Your attorney can help you collect this information from your spouse if they don’t deliver it.

Standard items for spousal support include:

  • Both party’s employment history, current status, and income
  • Any supplemental income and investments either party has
  • The length of your marriage
  • Both spouses monetary and non-monetary contributions
  • The reason for the divorce (for “at fault” in states that have at-fault divorces)

To calculate child support, you generally need the financial data listed above and:

  • The names and ages of your children
  • Whether they are enrolled in a secondary institution
  • How much you each pay for insurance for your children
  • How much you each pay for daycare for your children
  • What custody arrangements are
  • Whether child support is a factor for children from other marriages for either of you

Type of Support Given

While details fluctuate by state, what is covered by child support is pretty consistent. Custodial parents purchase items like groceries, clothing, school supplies, and a percentage of all medical bills with child support funds. Other expenses are split between parents, usually on a ratio decided by the child support calculations. For example, the spouse paying child support might pay 65% of an extracurricular activity.

The early days of paying and receiving child support can be confusing and stressful. However, both parents will end up understanding how the system works and adapting to it. If you are currently in the process of setting up your spousal support and child support, contact a lawyer, like a child support lawyer from The Law Office of Jason Wright, PLLC, to have them help you. They will work with you to make sure that it’s done correctly.

Filed Under: Uncategorized Tagged With: child support lawyer

January 15, 2021 by admin

The Admissibility of the Impressions and Conclusions of a Treating Physician

Personal Injury Lawyer

Several cases from the Virginia Supreme Court have held that treating physicians may testify regarding their impressions and conclusions formed while treating a patient, that deviations from the medical records does not render testimony inadmissible, and that only testimony constituting a diagnosis must be stated to a reasonable degree of medical probability, as a medical malpractice lawyer, such as from The Law Offices of Ryan Quinn, PLLC, can explain.  

In Pettus v. Gottfried, 269 Va. 69 (2005), the Virginia Supreme Court held admissible under Code § 8.01-399 a treating cardiologist’s testimony that a patient’s change in mental status “could have been” a central nervous system problem. Id. at 77-78. Although the cardiologist’s statement was not rendered within a reasonable degree of medical probability, the court held that the testimony was admissible because it did not constitute a diagnosis. Id. at 78.  The court characterized the testimony as “factual in nature,” and determined that the testimony merely explained the physician’s impressions and conclusions formed while treating the patient.  Id. at 77-78.  The court also disagreed with the contention that the cardiologist’s testimony was inadmissible since it deviated from the entries in the medical records.  The court held that since the medical records mentioned the possibility of a central nervous system embolic event, any distinction to be drawn between the written entry and the cardiologist’s testimony did not affect the admissibility but was a proper subject for cross examination.  Id. at 78.

Similarly, in Holmes v. Levine, 273 Va. 150 (2007), a medical malpractice case against a radiologist, the Virginia Supreme Court considered the medical testimony of a treating urologist to determine whether that testimony involved the rendering of a diagnosis.  Id.  At issue were the portions of § 8.01-399 referring to “diagnoses, signs and symptoms, observations, evaluations, histories, or treatment plan” that are “contemporaneously documented during the course of the practitioner’s treatment” and the requirement that a diagnosis must be “offered to a reasonable degree of medical probability” in order for it to be admissible at trial.  In Holmes, the urinalysis report indicated a “trace” of blood in the plaintiff’s urine.  Id. at 163.  In testimony later elicited by defense counsel, the urologist testified that she “did not think that an occasional red blood cell would qualify for microscopic hematuria.” Id. at 157.  The court held that this statement was not a medical diagnosis but was merely the urologist’s “impression,” formed during the plaintiff’s treatment, and was not her present medical expert opinion about the clinical significance of the results of the urinalysis.  Id. at 162.  The court also found that any distinction between the documentation in plaintiff’s medical records and the urologist’s testimony “did not affect the admissibility of the testimony but was a proper subject for cross-examination of the witness.”  Id. at 163.

And, in Graham v. Cook, 278 Va. 233 (2009), the Virginia Supreme Court considered the challenged testimony of Graham’s two radiologists.  Id. at 244.  At issue were statements that there was a “possibility of avascular necrosis,” that “avascular necrosis cannot be excluded,” that there was a “suspicion for avascular necrosis,” and a bony defect suggested a “fracture and avascular necrosis.”  Id.  The Court concluded that the challenged statements were factual in nature and related the physicians’ impressions and conclusions formed when treating plaintiff.  The court found that as factual impressions formed during these doctors’ treatment of plaintiff, the challenged findings were analogous to the statement from the treating cardiologist in Pettus that the patient’s change in mental status “could have been” a central nervous system problem, and the statement from the treating urologist in Holmes that she “did not think that an occasional red blood cell would qualify for microscopic hematuria.” Id. at 244-45.  The court further found that statements did not constitute diagnoses because they did not purport to identify specifically the cause of plaintiff’s health condition based on his signs and symptoms.  Id. at 245.  Therefore, because the statements did not impart a diagnosis, the statements were admissible under Code § 8.01-399(B), regardless of whether they were stated within a reasonable degree of medical probability.  Id.

If you’ve been injured and are wondering if you have a strong legal case, don’t wait to talk with a personal injury lawyer. Contact a law firm today for a consultation.

Filed Under: Uncategorized Tagged With: personal injury lawyer

January 15, 2021 by admin

What is the difference between a prosecutor and an Assistant District Attorney?

When one is unfamiliar with the U.S. criminal justice system, the many intricate parts and judicial process may seem confusing and possibly overwhelming. This may be particularly true if one has never before been charged with a crime, but is now facing the possibility of incarceration if convicted. A good lawyer protects the rights of the accused. His or her clients likely come from a wide range of backgrounds. 

When first represented by an experienced criminal defense lawyer, many clients have never before been charged with wrongdoing. Others may have previous convictions on their record and recognize the importance of hiring a skilled lawyer who will vigorously protect their rights. Regardless of which category you fall into, rest assured that your case will deserve the focus and dedication that it deserves. To this end, an attorney will carefully manage his or her caseload so that every criminal defense lawyer on their team has the necessary resources to present a solid defense strategy.

Is every criminal case tried in court the same way?

No. In fact, there is not always a jury. But regardless of whether or not a jury is present, there is always a prosecutor and a defendant.

  • The prosecutor represents the state or U.S. Federal government.
  • A criminal defense lawyer represents the defendant who is accused of a crime.

In addition, during a criminal trial, the prosecutor as well as the criminal defense lawyer begins the trial with what is called an “opening statement.” This is a brief summary of what crime the defendant is charged with.

  • The prosecutor’s opening statement will also include a brief summary of why they believe the defendant is guilty and how they will prove that.
  • The criminal defense lawyer’s opening statement will also include a brief summary of why the defendant is innocent and how they will prove that.

What is the role of the prosecutor?

In most instances, the prosecutor represents the local District Attorney’s office. In this role, the prosecutor is an Assistant District Attorney. That individual is often referred to as the “Assistant DA” or the “ADA.”  Because the burden of proof is on the prosecutor, they must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant is guilty of the crime with which they were charged. In theory, a defendant is not required to do anything. They and their criminal defense lawyer could remain silent during the entire trial and only respond to questions from the prosecutor and judge. However, in order to inject as much doubt into the prosecution’s case and attack the proof they submit to the court, the criminal defense lawyer should take an active part in the trial.

Should I hire a criminal defense lawyer to represent me?

The answer is a resounding yes. Most persons do not qualify for free legal services from a public defender, but in most instances, hiring an experienced and successful attorney, like a criminal defense attorney from The Morales Law Firm, will provide the best chance for an acquittal or to have your charge dropped so you can avoid a trial altogether.

Filed Under: Uncategorized Tagged With: criminal defense attorney

January 15, 2021 by admin

Everything You Need to Know About a Traffic Court Hearing

The last thing anyone wants is to receive a ticket after getting pulled over by a police officer. Sometimes the officer will let you off with a warning, but other times they may be less generous. Once you’ve gotten the ticket, you may wonder if you can challenge it in court if you feel it was given unfairly. Pleading “not guilty” to a ticket isn’t the only option, however, as you can also try to get your fine reduced. Here are some important things to know about a traffic court hearing and what to expect if you plan on going.

Paying the Ticket 

The path of less stress and hassle comes simply in the form of paying the ticket. Most of the time, you’ll have the option to pay it online or through the mail and be done with it. Just understand that paying it means you plead guilty.

Appearing Before a Judge

If you don’t have the funds to pay the fine written on the ticket, or if you feel you were treated unfairly but are still guilty, you can appear before a judge to make your case. The time and date to do so will be indicated on your ticket. When your case is called, you can make your argument before the judge; for example, if there was an emergency the day you were pulled over and that’s why you were speeding. It isn’t always guaranteed, but the judge has the right to reduce your fine if they feel swayed by your plea.

Pleading “Not Guilty”

If you feel you were not guilty of the reason for the ticket, you can plead “not guilty” before the judge in the same scenario as above. The judge will then set another date for your trial. This will include summoning the police officer who gave you the ticket.

At the Trial 

Traffic court hearings are fairly straightforward and simple. If the officer who gave you the ticket does not show up, the judge will likely toss your case out altogether before it even begins. Otherwise, the officer will testify with any evidence for your ticket and you can ask them questions in cross examination. Then you can present any evidence and testify should you choose. The judge will take this into consideration and determine if you must pay the ticket or not.

If you find yourself in need of a traffic court hearing, consider consulting with a lawyer, like a criminal lawyer from Rispoli & Borneo, P.C., about the details of your case. They can help you determine if it is worth your time.

Filed Under: Uncategorized Tagged With: criminal lawyer

Next Page »
  • Home
  • Credentials Matter
  • Practice Areas
    • Brooklyn Personal Injury Lawyers
    • Car Accident Lawyers in Brooklyn
    • Brooklyn Workers Compensation Lawyers
    • Medical Malpractice Lawyers of Brooklyn Persoonal Injury Law
    • Wrongful Death Lawyers in Brooklyn NY
    • Mesothelioma
  • Blog
  • Free Case Evaluation

BROOKLYN, NY PERSONAL INJURY RESOURCES

Brooklyn Personal Injury Law Firm
Brooklyn Personal Injury Attorney
Brooklyn Car Accident Lawyers
Brooklyn Medical Malpractice Attorneys

Other Resources


Washington DC Medical Injury Lawyer
Service Truck Accident Lawyer, DC
DC Slip and Fall Lawyer
Elizabeth, NJ Workers Comp Attorney
Car Accident Attorneys Indianapolis IN
Who is the Top Bankruptcy Lawyer in Cypress, TX
Hallinan Law Firm California Criminal Law
Brain Injury Lawyer Kansas City MO
Truck Accident Lawyer Las Vegas NV
Car Accident Lawyer Chicago, IL

Free Consultation

Request a free consultation with one of Brooklyn, NY's premier personal injury law firms.

Request Free Consultation

© COPYRIGHT 2021 BROOKLYN PERSONAL INJURY LAWYERS | POWERED BY Matador Solutions - Digital Marketing Company